The Slowcook at Spydog Farm The Slowcook at Spydog Farm

Fenty Would Axe Healthy School Funding

November 24th, 2010 · 1 Comment · Posted in Blog

Outgoing Mayor Adrian Fenty

When times get tough, the first thing to go apparently is better school food.

Outgoing D.C. Mayor Adrian Fenty, attempting to close a $188 million gap in the city’s budget, has proposed eliminating funds that had been designated for better school meals as part of a “Healthy Schools” initiative approved earlier this year.

The budget measure would halt payment of some $4.6 million that was to pay an extra 10 cents for every breakfast served in D.C. Public Schools, an extra 10 cents for every lunch, and five cents for every lunch meal that contained a locally grown component.

The legislation, which was months in the making and funded only after a dramatic controversy over a proposed “soda tax,” had placed the District of Columbia in the forefront of local jurisdictions attempting to improve the quality of meals children eat at school.

The extra funding, in addition to some $7 million in deficit spending the schools currently contribute to the food program, would have made D.C. one of the most generous school districts in the country where its meals are concerned.

Healthier food advocates today were scrambling to determine exactly what effect Fenty’s proposed budget measure would have. It was thought that the funds in question had been garnered exclusively by placing a sales tax on soft drink and were dedicated to funding better school meals.

The “Healthy Schools” legislation took effect at the beginning of the current school year in August and had an immediate impact on the meal service. Because I monitor breakfast and lunch service at my daughter’s elementary school, I could see that fruits and vegetables grown here in the Mid-Atlantic region ere appearing on kids’ cafeteria trays on a daily basis.

At the same time, a new food services director for D.C. Public Schools, Jeffrey Mills, had removed flavored milk as well as a number of sugary, processed foods such as Pop-Tarts and Apple Jacks from the schools and had completely revamped the menu served by Chartwells, the system’s hired food service provider.

D.C. Councilmember Mary Cheh (D-Ward 3), who authored the bill and had spent months working out its details with various local non-profit groups, health authorities and food access advocates, told The Washington Post, “I’m trying to be open-minded about this. If everyone is going to feel the pain, everything is going to be on the table,”

Andrea Northup, coordinator of the D.C. Farm to School Network, who was one of the leaders in crafting the school food aspects of the legislation, vowed to fight the proposed budget action.

“For the Fenty administration to champion the Healthy Schools Act as a model for the nation, and then to cut funding for the act, they have done a grave disservice to the children of the District of Columbia,” Northup said. “We’re talking about high-risk youth: three in four are at risk of hunger, one in three are overweight or obese, and most eat their daily meals at school.  As an advocacy community, we won’t let this stand.”

Legislation that would add a mere six cents to the $2.72 the federal government pays for a subsidized lunch is stalled in Congress because it would be funded by more than $2 billion taken from the food stamp program.

Leave a Comment

Please note: Your comment may have to wait for approval to be published to ensure that we don't accidentally publish "spam". We thank you for understanding.

*

  • Carl Rollins

    This is business as usual for the political/lobbying crowd. This is one of the reasons I prefer direct service and volunteering rather than put ourselves at the mercy of people who will seek every loophole and split every hair and claim that what they are doing is perfectly legal. I trust and value most those who come out reliably and sacrifice their time to promote health and wellness in the community.

    I disagree with those holding up the child nutrition reauthorization. According to an article in the Post by Jane Black on September 30th the $2 billion from food stamps was from a temporary fund set aside in case food prices went up a couple of years ago; but they never did. Most of the elected officials who voted against reauthorization had voted to slice a whopping $12 billion from the same fund a month before to pay teachers.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/30/AR2010093003989.html

    We shouldn’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.